Too bad, cause I agree with Giampaolo, it would be great. What about making a plugin includi
ng OCR components but instead of using inner dictionnary, passing it back to spamassassin th
rough the MTA... Yeah, I know, the load will increase ... But that would be nice ?

...

... Ok,I go back to sleep ....

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Randal, Phil [mailto:prandal@[...].uk] 
Envoyé : lundi 2 octobre 2006 16:19
Ã? : users@[...].org
Objet : RE: Stock spam in images

Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:

>  And, by the way, it seems to work!
>  
>  Actually, the only limit I see is the own-made FuzzyOcr.words (and, 
>  maybe, the fact that script text may probably get undetected). 
>  Wouldn't it be better to inject the detected text back to SA? There 
>  should be enough variants of spam worlds to let SA fuzzily catch the 
>  ones from images.
>  
>  Am I wrong?

I think so.  Some of the words would be perfectly legitimate in the text of emails but rarel
y found in attached legitimate images.

Quite apart from the fact that Spamassassin isn't designed for "reinjection".

Cheers,

Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK