ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> spamassassin-users
spamassassin-users
Re: [sa-list] Re: [sa-list] Re: Way to skip scanning per-user?
by Dan Mahoney other posts by this author
Dec 14 2006 9:25AM messages near this date
Re: Way to skip scanning per-user? | Re: [sa-list] Re: [sa-list] Re: Way to skip scanning per-user?
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:

>  On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:11:11PM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> > At the moment, that's a hack in the system-wide procmailrc that I don't
> > know how to do, since the only thing procmail knows about userspace is
> > "dropprivs="yes"", and there's no translation for an easy way to equate
> > that to email address (i.e. it allows me to do it per *domain* not per
> > user, i.e. *@mydomain.com, but if a user has two domains, then I'd have to
> > do them each separately).
> 
>  If you're using procmail, you could look at the X-Original-To (or similar)
>  header to figure out who the mail is going to.  Otherwise, you could modify
>  your setup to pass information in to procmail from the MTA.
> 
> > Presuming we're looking for the value of the "user" based on the email
> > address, yes, I understand, but can't you check the value of -u before you
> > even do that? (i.e. at the earliest point)
> 
>  Ah, there you're talking about spamc/spamd which is a different beasty all
>  together.  If you want to skip checks based on how you're calling spamc, then
>  check the value you're going to use for the username and don't call spamc if
>  you don't want the mail scanned.

I'm running procmail with dropprivs=yes.  There's no easy procmail thing 
for (getpwnam($<)) and I do NOT feel like firing up perl on every message 
to evaluate that just to figure out if I should fire up the C program that 
I use so I don't have to fire up perl.

I see procmail macros for the email address, and for the _TO thing, but 
NOTHING that just gives you the goddamned login.

I don't need -u on spamc, spamc just picks up that username and runs with 
it.  If I'm running spamc as danm, spamd grabs danm's prefs.

When I said -u, I was asking how spamd would recognize the implied value 
of -u, not the actual command line flag.

If that makes sense?

-Dan

--

"It would be bad."

-Egon Spengler, "Ghostbusters"

--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie,  Sysadmin,  WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144   AIM: LarpGM
Site:  http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------
Thread:
Dan Mahoney
Neal Coffey
Dan Mahoney
John D. Hardin
Theo Van Dinter
Dan Mahoney
Theo Van Dinter
John D. Hardin
Dan Mahoney
Dan Mahoney
Theo Van Dinter

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved