A lack of productivity is killing Smalltalk.
by Janko Mivsek other posts by this author
Aug 12 2007 1:37PM messages near this date
Re: [ANN] SIXX 0.2c is available on all major Smalltalk dialects
|
Re: A lack of productivity is killing Smalltalk.
Another one from blogosfere. For our rethinking ...
http://pinderkent.blogsavy.com/archives/99
A lack of productivity is killing Smalltalk.
I heard today that the development of Dolphin Smalltalk has been
discontinued. Although it isnâ??t a product I used or was familiar with, I
have been involved with a number of Smalltalk-based development efforts
in the past. While it was somewhat popular in the late 1980s and early
1990s, the commercial usage of Smalltalk has declined significantly
since then.
Slava Pestov suggests how poor implementations are leading to the
downfall of Smalltalk. I would tend to agree, to some extent. Most
Smalltalk implementations really donâ??t compare to a development platform
like Java, or even what Microsoft has put together with C# and .NET.
However, I would tend to think that the main reason why Smalltalk has
started to really fall out of favor is that it doesnâ??t bring the level
of productivity that it used to, relative to other technologies. Back in
the early 1990s, a lot of enterprise-grade software was written using C
or C++. For developing complex business applications, Smalltalk often
did offer a very significant productivity boost to developers, even if
the runtime performance of the applications suffered somewhat. Being at
a higher-level, it allowed business rules and concepts to be more easily
and effectively represented in the software itself.
But that started to change by the mid-1990s. Java arose, and offered
many of the benefits that Smalltalk had been offering. Thatâ??s not to say
that Java, as a language, is comparable to Smalltalk. In many ways itâ??s
quite inferior, even over a decade after its initial release. But it was
more familiar to those developers whoâ??d come from the world of C and
C++, while also offering OO functionality and garbage collection similar
enough to that of Smalltalk.
Iâ??ve worked with several excellent Smalltalk developers in the past. A
talented, experienced professional can do wonders with Smalltalk.
Unfortunately for them, Java and its vast array of classes, class
libraries and frameworks have brought a similar level of productivity to
only average developers. So if these average developers can churn out an
adequate software product at a lower cost than the Smalltalk expert, as
has often become the case, then the business will flow towards the Java
developers.
Unless the Smalltalk developers bring something to the party that
drastically increases their productivity (or their softwareâ??s
productivity) over that put out by Java developers, they wonâ??t have a
real chance at survival.
--
Janko Mivšek
AIDA/Web
Smalltalk Web Application Server
http://www.aidaweb.si
Thread:
Janko Mivsek
Andres Valloud
Cees de Groot
Jason Johnson
Todd Blanchard
David Mitchell
Jason Johnson
goran
|