ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> squeak
squeak
[OT] How We Discuss Things
by Dan Shafer other posts by this author
Jul 31 2001 11:01PM messages near this date
Re: Newbie Squeak on Mac | Re: [OT] How We Discuss Things
As someone who has been involved in the online world longer 
than I care to admit and as someone who has  been deeply 
involved in online community for the past several years, I am 
intrigued by the fact that the Squeak community -- with one of the 
richest and most powerful environments on the planet 
presumably at everyone's disposal -- still feels most comfortable 
discussing our mutual interest in the relatively inefficient halls of 
a mailing list.

I don't subscribe to the list by email any longer (though I spent 
the past year doing so) because I found it too cluttered an 
experience, regardless of whether I used the digest or dealt with 
individual emails. Following threads was very difficult at best and 
filtering out topics in which I was not interested proved all but 
impossible.

Dealing with the list in quasi-discussion mode via the Yahoo! 
interface is a tiny bit more satisfying, but only a tiny bit.

It seems to me that if we moved from the older mailing list model 
to a true discussion board or Swiki model for all of our 
discussions, we'd all be enriched and our experience would be 
both more effective and more efficient. But I never hear anyone 
suggest this, which indicates perhaps I am alone in my feeling 
that this is such an archaic and relatively inefficient way of 
dealing with such material.

If Swiki isn't the right tool -- and I see some drawbacks to it that 
are addressed in every good discussion board tool I know about 
-- then perhaps a real discussion board tool is?

There is a way to experiment with this. I have access to a 
licensed Web Crossing discussion site where we could legally 
and easily reflect the mailing list in discussion topics and allow 
people to particpiate directly on the disussion board or via email 
or even mix those modes. I'd be willing to set up the site and 
open it to people who are interested in trying that mode of 
communication. It wouldn't disrupt the list any, but since it's not 
my list I don't think I should do this without some sort of 
agreement from at least some other list members.

Or perhaps we can write (or someone has written) a discussion 
board product in Squeak?

Thoughts?




=====
------- Dan Shafer, Author and Community Consultant
^. .^ | Commentator on Community, Web Building, Nanotech
 ='=  | Sr. Co-Editor, Online Community Report
      | Author, NanoTech, MegaQuake: Business Implications of
Squeak| Nanotechnology (Spring 2002), Wiley, ISBN 047120045X
------- http://www.gui.com (major update Spring 2001)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Thread:
Dan Shafer
Edmund Ronald
Andrew P. Black
John Hinsley
Jon Hylands
Rosemary Michelle Simpson
Edwin Pilobello
Rosemary Michelle Simpson
Rosemary Michelle Simpson
Gary McGovern
Edmund Ronald
Edwin Pilobello

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved