Re: [OT] How We Discuss Things
by Edmund Ronald other posts by this author
Aug 1 2001 12:07AM messages near this date
Re: [OT] How We Discuss Things
|
RE: [OT] How We Discuss Things
I agree with Rosemary and Gary that we need tools to recast the material.
In particular, I would love a quick and effective way to look at
a past mailing-list discussion, or even to catch up with a running thread
here ... My mailreader (Pine) is hopeless for this.
Edmund
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Gary McGovern wrote:
> From: "Rosemary Michelle Simpson"
>
> >Mailing lists are for me a critical source of new
> > insights precisely because they bring things to my attention.
> >
> > The issue, I think, is having a variety of tools for different mindsets
> > that captures the same material. This is the issue faced by information
> > structure designers and indexers - providing different gateways into and
> > different structures over the same material
>
> Yeah that sound about right. I'm currently studying MVC and think it is
> really class; and now I know about this technology I just can't understand
> why software generally only has one view of the domain and I think this
> applies to simple things such as a newsgroup.
>
> Regards,
> Gary
>
>
>
Thread:
Dan Shafer
Edmund Ronald
Andrew P. Black
John Hinsley
Jon Hylands
Rosemary Michelle Simpson
Edwin Pilobello
Rosemary Michelle Simpson
Rosemary Michelle Simpson
Gary McGovern
Edmund Ronald
Edwin Pilobello
|