ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> tcl-core
tcl-core
Re: [TCLCORE] Why ttk::dialog is gone?
by Gerald W. Lester other posts by this author
May 29 2007 10:56AM messages near this date
Re: [TCLCORE] Why ttk::dialog is gone? | Re: [TCLCORE] Why ttk::dialog is gone?
Anton Kovalenko wrote:
> >>>>> Gerald W Lester writes:
> >>>>>             
> 
>      GWL> You should not depend on *any* internal routine being there for
>      GWL> any given release, nor should you depend on their return
>      GWL> values, nor should you depend on the order of return values
>      GWL> where the
> 
>  Thank you for pointing out what I should and what I shouldn't do. For
>  now, unfortunately, there is nearly impossible to write complex,
>  good-looking GUI on Tk without a lot of small fixes that fine-tune
>  internal things of the toolkit. I know that nobody promised to keep
>  internals the same, and I wouldn't say a word if, e.g. ttk::combobox
>  implementation changed its listbox subwidget name or scrollbar type.
>  I would just change my code depending on it, if there is a dependency.
> 
>  The situation with ttk::dialog is different. Dialog API existed for
>  several versions of Tile. It was documented and it had a man page that
>  didn't gave a hint of it being "unofficial", "private" or "internal". Of
>  course you may argue that Tile is entirely unofficial before reaching
>  1.0, and so is Tk8.5 before its beta. Does it mean that everyone should
>  stop asking questions about this software and discussing it?
> 
>  Notice that I don't complain about this change. I just asked for a link
>  to any discussion that has taken place, if there is one. My first
>  thought was that something better is on the way to Tk that will replace
>  the old ttk::dialog - perhaps universal themed/non-themed dialog
>  implementation? Of course I'm interested to read about it. However,
>  I've found nothing of this kind in tcl-core@, TIP repository and
>  sourceforge database. Is there any other place that I have to monitor
>  for ongoing significant changes in Tk? Then I want to know where this
>  place is.
> 
>    
My apologies -- from the name I thought it was an internal.

You are correct this should not just go away.

-- 
+--------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Gerald W. Lester                                                       |
|"The man who fights for his ideals is the man who is alive." - Cervantes|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Thread:
Anton Kovalenko
Joe English
Gerald W. Lester
Anton Kovalenko
Gerald W. Lester
Larry W. Virden

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© 2004 ActiveState, a division of Sophos All rights reserved