Peter MacDonald wrote:
>  Another issue to document: collateral breakage:
> 
>    set x [.0 + 3]
>    ...
>    frame .0
>    ...
>    set x [.0 + 3]
> 
>  The first [set x] works, but not the second.    Maybe this suggests that the 
>  syntax should require braces
> 
>    set x [(.0+3)]
>    
Do you mean parentheses (()), or do you really mean braces ({})?  I 
think requiring braces is a bad idea.

I think in this case ".0" should *not* be recognized as a number.  This 
is not an unreasonable restriction for expressions, IMO.

-Brian


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Tcl-Core mailing list
Tcl-Core@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core