On 23 May 2006, at 19:29, Jeff Hobbs wrote:
> 
>  While I strongly favor a distributed CMS, monotone is largely  
>  unproven, git is
>  unix only, and bitkeeper is commercial (though I'm sure we can arrange
>  licenses).  If others favor the idea, we could do bitkeeper with a CVS
>  read-only front-end.  It may also be possible to have a limited CVS  
>  read/write
>  front-end.

For what it's worth, I would not be in favour of this at all. I think  
we should keep with the open software approach. I agree that a  
distributed SCM system would be great but as you point out, options  
are limited in that respect.

            /  http://www.fishpool.com/~setok/



-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Tcl-Core mailing list
Tcl-Core@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core