On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Donal K. Fellows
<donal.k.fellows@[...].uk>  wrote:
>  Alexandre Ferrieux wrote:
> 
>  > What about doing this iteration on a byte array rather than a string ?
>  > (of course it may not deserve the [string foreach] name in that case ;-)
>  >
> 
>   What about that? (The problems I'm talking about don't relate to the
>   type of characters in the buffer...)

The idea is that the ByteArray is an internal rep, with all its
extensibility like sub-refcounting, while you seemed worried that the
string rep was a more restricted thing (the -> bytes pointer).
But maybe I misread your mind ?

-Alex

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Tcl-Core mailing list
Tcl-Core@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core