>  But are there any really critical
>  problems left that can't be dealt with later? 

Well, there is TIP#279. Shouldn't there be an attempt of achieving an 
amalgam of these two TIPs, following a qualified evaluation of the 
underyling proposals? I am wondering why TIP#279 seems to be neglected 
entirely! A reconciliation appears necessary considering that there are 
more than convincing implementation references in TIP#279, not to 
mention the expertise of TIP#279 lead authors.

Thanks for a clarification!

//stefan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Tcl-Core mailing list
Tcl-Core@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcl-core