Donal K. Fellows wrote:
>  Tomasz Kosiak wrote:
>    
>  ...
> > I would liked TIP#279 authors and promoters to speak out how this
> > TIP#257 vs TIP#279 problem could be resolved.
> >     
> 
>  ...
> 
>  I see from the change history of the TIP that nothing has happened on
>  this TIP since 2006, so I question whether it is worth the risk delaying
>  for it. I also don't feel like working on it myself at this stage; if it
>  just comes down to me, I'll go ahead with plain #257 since we know
>  that's in a good state implementation-wise (TclOO, which can be used as
>  an exemplar since it has limited scope and ambition) and pretty-much
>  completely written up
I agree that TIP 257 should go up for a vote and not (again) be stalled 
by 279, particularly since we've not seen any work on 279 come out and 
since several people have been beating on 257 and found it very useful.

-- 
+--------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Gerald W. Lester                                                       |
|"The man who fights for his ideals is the man who is alive." - Cervantes|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+