On Jun 18, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Jim DeVona wrote:

>  On 6/18/07, Tim Jones <tjmac@[...].com> wrote:
> 
> >>> Which, BTW, brings me to the next point.  Has anyone actually heard
> >>> or read an official Apple stand on all of this, or are we all just
> >>> letting another list's conjecture get our dander up?
> >>
> >> It doesn't specifically address the ramifications for Tcl/Tk, but
> >> known facts about 64-bit Carbon are being collected here:
> >>
> >> http://www.carbondev.com/site/?page=64-bit+Carbon
> >
> > That's the list I was referring to.  However, no official Apple
> > statements (that I've seen), just more conjecture by those of us who
> > "heard" something, somewhere...
> 
>  Ah, OK. Apologies for the redundant link. Anyway, I guess the Apple
>  engineer's statements are as official as it gets so far.

The most explicit statement that I've come across from an Apple  
representative is:

"Carbon will not be entirely 64-bit capable in Leopard."

That's really not saying much and definitely doesn't imply that  
Carbon is going away...

Tim