Re: [tcljava-dev] tcljava-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 2
by Charles Oliver Nutter other posts by this author
Feb 22 2007 1:13AM messages near this date
Re: [tcljava-dev] tcljava-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 2
|
Re: [tcljava-dev] tcljava-dev Digest, Vol 5, Issue 2
Bruce Johnson wrote:
> I agree to some extent with what you say, but personally I think that
> when the core of a language like Jacl catches up with the C version
> (and it is not that far now), that progress can potentially occur
> much faster. There are so many APIs built-in to Java that writing
> extensions is much faster than with C development, and once written
> they are cross-platform. For example, I have scripted access to
> Oracle databases with just a few lines of Jacl calling the JDBC
> APIs. I probably never would have set out to write a C interface to
> Oracle (like Oratcl etc.), but doing this with Jacl was a breeze.
I was going to respond myself, but Bruce is exactly right here. What
library exists in the C world that we don't have an analog for in Java?
Generally porting over "extensions" just means providing a compatible
interface to the same library in Java. In JRuby, that's exactly how
we've provided socket support, zlib support, and so on. There are cases
where a technology needs to be ported because it's based on a very
specialized library (OpenSSL) or a technology is too new to have a Java
equivalent (YAML) but we've had community members step up to the
challenge of implementing those too.
I think in general the problem most dynamic languages on the JVM have
had is that they target the wrong goal: some amorphous measure of
"compatibility" with the target language. What's needed is a concrete
goal people can latch onto and get excited about; some endpoint that
will actually help developers do something they couldn't do before. For
JRuby that milestone is Rails support (and BTW, Rails does run fine in
JRuby apart from a few remaining interpreter bugs since it's generally
pure Ruby), which has been a compelling enough goal to get folks really
excited about JRuby. Similar targets exist for Jython, and perhaps
Grails will be the first really compelling use of Groovy.
The big question then becomes "what milestone can we set for our
implementation of language X that will get people excited about using it?"
- Charlie
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
tcljava-dev mailing list
tcljava-dev@[...].net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tcljava-dev
Thread:
Patrick Finnegan
Bruce Johnson
Charles Oliver Nutter
Larry W. Virden
Bruce Johnson
Larry W. Virden
|