Re: [Types-sig] "Interfaces" Jargon
by M.-A. Lemburg other posts by this author
Nov 26 1998 2:26AM messages near this date
Re: [Types-sig] "Interfaces" Jargon
|
Re: [Types-sig] "Interfaces" Jargon
Justus Pendleton wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 1998 at 11:08:20AM +0100, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> > Hmm. I seem to recall that the result was 19 votes for
> > interfaces and 17 votes for behaviour, or something not
> > very far that. And the term "behaviour" was introduced
> > just a few minutes before the poll...
>
> You couldn't possibly use "behaviour" ... it would _have_ to be "behavior" :)
Another reason not to use that term :-)
Since classes already have "class", why not add some "style" ?
Types would look pretty dull in that glamorous company, though.
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg Y2000: 401 days left
---------------------------------------------------------------------
: Python Pages > >> http://starship.skyport.net/~lemburg/ :
---------------------------------------------------------
Thread:
Fredrik Lundh
M.-A. Lemburg
Justus Pendleton
|