I sure would like to second that thought.  I have the darnedest time convincing my company t
o use Perl for its major CGI development 
because of the lack of an IDE with debugging _and CVS integration_ built-in.  They usually e
nd up with InterDev, Websphere or 
ColdFusion.  Perl needn't be relegated as inferior to those packages.  Save us ActiveState! 
:-)
   Scott

>  I bought perlbuilder when it first came out and was disappointed in it 
>  overall. I hope that Visual Perl doesn't disappoint me in the same way. 
>  The lack of a real IDE for Perl almost makes me want to stop using it 
>  because it's a nightmare to create heavy duty perl programs without 
>  one. 
>  
>  Secondly, I would hope that there is support for perlex and modperl 
>  built into Visual Perl.
>  
>  Thirdly, how about a section of the program really dedicated to the 
>  process of developing CGIs. Perlbuilder had something like this but 
>  again, it was a real piece of garbage.
>  _______________________________________________
>  VisualPerl mailing list
>  VisualPerl@[...].com
>  http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/visualperl
>  
>  

--
Sent using NeoMail, a web-based e-mail client.
http://neomail.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
VisualPerl mailing list
VisualPerl@[...].com
http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/visualperl