ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> visualperl-discuss
visualperl-discuss
RE: [Visualperl-discuss] FW: Visual Studio ASP.NET web applicationsusing ActivePerl, VisualPerl, and PDK
by Matt Herdon other posts by this author
Jan 20 2005 8:40AM messages near this date
view in the new Beta List Site
RE: [Visualperl-discuss] FW: Visual Studio ASP.NET web applicationsusing ActivePerl, VisualPerl, and PDK | Re: [Visualperl-discuss] FW: Visual Studio ASP.NET web applications using ActivePerl, VisualPerl, and PDK
Hi David- my comments inline below -Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: David Christensen [mailto:dpchrist@[...].com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 6:37 AM
Matt Herdon wrote:
>  Frankly, the numbers don't currently add up for us to do this.

>  Which numbers are you referring to?

Revenue, customer demand, and cost.

>  Not least of which is the huge issue of effectively developing a 
>  variant of Perl that would work on .NET.  We've worked with Microsoft 
>  and developed of both PerlNET and PerlASPX as highly compatible ways 
>  of taking Perl code to .NET.
>  Ultimately, taking Perl truly to .NET would likely break compatibility 
>  with much of CPAN modules (the CLR and its security imposes 
>  requirements that prevent Perl from working naturally). Hence the most 
>  viable solution is probably to create a Perl-like language
>  (P#?) that breaks away from CPAN -- and consequently wouldn't actually 
>  be Perl any longer by most people's reckoning.

>  Have you tried talking to Perl people, such as Larry Wall, Randall
Schwartz, and Tom Christiansen?

We (meaning others more technically savvy than me!) have talked to lots of
people, but the numbers are ultimately what make this viable for a business
like ActiveState.

>  ActiveState could provide tools for such a language, but is not in the 
>  business of creating new languages.

>  ActiveState might want to consider getting involved, as you do have a
stake in the outcome.

Agreed, and we have, repeatedly, and would get involved if such a project
were spawned, but there is no way we can _drive_ this kind of work.

>  Combining the above two ideas, perhaps .NET compatibility could be a
feature of Perl 6.

Yup, it could.

>  In the meanwhile PerlNET is the best way to take Perl code to .NET, 
>  and it's part of the PDK. PDK is integrated with Visual Perl. Both 
>  hold compatibility with Perl to be most important.


David

_______________________________________________
VisualPerl-discuss mailing list
VisualPerl-discuss@[...].com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
Thread:
David Christensen
Eric Promislow
David Christensen
Eric Promislow
David Christensen
Matt Herdon
David Christensen
Matt Herdon
Brendan LeFebvre

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© 2004 ActiveState, a division of Sophos All rights reserved