ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> wxpython-users
wxpython-users
Re: [wxpython-users] wxMediaCtrl
by Josiah Carlson other posts by this author
Jun 4 2009 10:21PM messages near this date
Re: [wxpython-users] wxMediaCtrl | Re: [wxpython-users] wxMediaCtrl
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Timothy W. Grove <tim_grove@[...].org>  wrote:
>  Dear Josiah,
> 
>  This is quite an old posting, but I'm facing a similar problem to Stuart. In
>  your response below you mentioned specifically:
> 
>  "Alternatively (what I would suggest) is to create a secondary thread
>  that uses wx.CallAfter() to call the wx.Timer event handler that you
>  would have written every 10 ms or so..."
> 
>  Could you expand any further on how you would use wxCallAfter, perhaps an
>  example line of code? I think at some point today I was trying to use
>  wxCallLater() in a new thread, but it kept telling me that I needed to call
>  the timer from the main thread instead. I'm using wxPython 2.8 under Windows
>  Vista, if that makes any difference!

You are in luck, I only randomly check threads here. :)

import threading
import wx

_stop = {}
def call_every(function, msdelay, token=None):
    if token is None:
        token = object()
        threading.Thread(target=call_repeatedly, args=(function,
msdelay, token).start()
        _stop[token] = 0
        return token
    time.sleep(msdelay/1000.0)
    while not _stop[token]:
        wx.CallAfter(function, token)
        time.sleep(msdelay/1000.0)
    _stop.pop(token)

def stop(token):
    _stop[token] = 1


Used like:
self.stopper = call_every(self.OnTimer, 10)

Then in OnTimer:
if <condition for stop> :
    stop(self.stopper)

It's a bit of boilerplate, but it might be more convenient for
non-timer-based polls.

For some of my own stuff, I'm actually using a secondary thread to
handle all of my wx.FutureCall() and wx.Timer() replacements.  One
thread for maybe a dozen delayed things.

Though...maybe a wx.FutureCall() is really what you are looking for
(check status, if it's not what you want, wx.FutureCall()).

 - Josiah

>  Josiah Carlson wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Stuart Thiessen
> > <thiessenstuart@[...].com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I am working on a program where I want to be able to let a user select a
> >> start and end point in a video using MediaCtrl.Tell() to find the actual
> >> points. Then I want them to be able to click a button and just play that
> >> clip. Finding those points is simple enough, but I am apparently not
> >> doing
> >> it right to start it playing at the start point and tell it to pause or
> >> stop
> >> at the end point.
> >>
> >> Any suggestions?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Stuart
> >>
> >> My code is as follows: (where self.startclip is the ms to start playing
> >> and
> >> self.endclip is the ms to end playing. I am assuming as I look at my
> >> code,
> >> that I need to do something with an Event handler somehow instead of what
> >> I'm doing, but I'm not sure how I would do that.
> >>
> >> def OnPlayClip(self, evt):
> >>               self.mc.Seek(self.startclip)
> >>               self.mc.Play()
> >>               while self.mc.Tell() < self.endclip:
> >>                       pass
> >>               self.mc.Stop()
> >>
> >
> > That while loop is going to kill you, which is why things aren't
> > working.  Create a wx.Timer instance and have it signal an event every
> > 100ms or so where you do your check to see if you should stop the
> > video.
> >
> > Alternatively (what I would suggest) is to create a secondary thread
> > that uses wx.CallAfter() to call the wx.Timer event handler that you
> > would have written every 10 ms or so.  Why?  Because wx.Timer()
> > instances are limited depending on the platform, have very limited
> > precision, etc.  I've found that just running a single thread in the
> > background to handle scheduled events to be generally faster (a future
> > release of PyPE uses this method to improve performance on OS X
> > significantly).
> >
> >  - Josiah
> > _______________________________________________
> > wxpython-users mailing list
> > wxpython-users@[...].org
> > http://lists.wxwidgets.org/mailman/listinfo/wxpython-users
> >
> >
> 
>  _______________________________________________
>  wxpython-users mailing list
>  wxpython-users@[...].org
>  http://lists.wxwidgets.org/mailman/listinfo/wxpython-users
> 
_______________________________________________
wxpython-users mailing list
wxpython-users@[...].org
http://lists.wxwidgets.org/mailman/listinfo/wxpython-users
Thread:
Stuart Thiessen
Josiah Carlson
Timothy W. Grove
Josiah Carlson
Stuart Thiessen

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved