Banerjee, Saurabh wrote:

>  Thanks John! Actually the question was what is the equivalent of the
>  following schema definition in DTD terms?


Ah.  DTDs have no equivalent of xs:all at all.   You either have
to tighten up the content model and require ordering, or loosen
it and allow multiple fnames and lnames.

My advice, if this is a real problem and not a mere test, would
be to go with commonName, sortName anyhow, because you cannot
be guaranteed to have just two parts to a name, nor which part is
appropriate to sort on:

<personnel> 
    <commonName> George W. Bush</commonName>
    <sortName> Bush, George W.</sortName>
</personnel> 

vs.

<personnel> 
    <commonName> Davíð Oddsson</commonName>
    <sortName> Davíð Oddsson</sortName>
</personnel> 


-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@[...].com>      http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>