Re: [xml-dev] Web Design Principles (was Re: [xml-dev] Generality of HTTP)
by Gavin Thomas Nicol other posts by this author
Jan 29 2002 3:34AM messages near this date
RE: [xml-dev] Web Design Principles (was Re: [xml-dev] Generality
of HTTP)
|
[xml-dev] Auto-completion in editors (RE: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Origin, the XM
L Editor & XSLT Debugger Released)
On Monday 28 January 2002 10:23 am, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Urrrrp! No. It is the smaller corporations
> who have to be strict because they have a lot
> fewer resources for negotiating out what is
> signal and what is noise.
If you mean smaller corporations bear the burden of acting "correctly", this is often true.
Practically, this means they often foot a large part of the bill for maintenance.
(Seriously, I myself have had to reverse engineer a number of third-party systems because th
e large vendor didn't act according to specification.... in one case I had to rewrite the la
rge vendors code. Such are the joys of integration.)
> Do I have to rely on their code as the contract
> for all the instances?
For many small EDI players, the answer is a groaned "yes....".
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
Thread:
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Gavin Thomas Nicol
|