Ronald Bourret wrote:
>  
>  Evan Lenz wrote:
>  > Is it too late to fix this? W3C specs would have to change. My question is:
>  > who else uses QNames in attribute values? Is there no turning back?
>  
>  Anybody who wants to represent graphs at the schema level.

I thought again and realized it's more general than that. Qnames in
attribute values are useful to anyone who wants to point to element
types (as opposed to elements). This represents a good-sized class of
metadata-driven applications.

-- Ron

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>