On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Paul Prescod wrote:

>  Just "convenient"? Show me how a system like the Web could work without
>  URIs. One domain name per document? How do you decide what protocol to
>  use to retrieve it?

Yes, one domain name per document. What's wrong with that? We can do it
already with HTTP virtual hosting and CNAMEs and the common shortcut that
a browser will map a raw domain name into http://domain/.

Consider X.500, which is 'URIs done properly'; it's a single resolution
system, with only one protocol accessing it (so clients are easy to write;
ever written a complete URI resolver? Lotsa cases to handle...) for all
resources. This is putting a decent naming system in as the core of a
distributed system, rather than hacking one in on top to try and unify a
load of different resource types.

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>