ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> xml-dev
xml-dev
RE: [xml-dev] Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
by Julian Reschke other posts by this author
Feb 28 2002 7:06PM messages near this date
Re: [xml-dev] Question about the sytax of namespace declarations | Re: [xml-dev] Question about the sytax of namespace declarations
>  From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@[...].com]
>  Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:12 PM
>  To: xml-dev@[...].org
>  Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Question about the sytax of namespace
>  declarations
> 
> 
>  At 12:41 PM 27/02/02 -0800, Wayne Steele wrote:
>  >Question:
>  >
>  >Is the below document "conforming" with regard to the XML-Namespaces rec?
>  >
>  ><root xmlns:a="" />
> 
>  It's not, but this is probably a bug BTW.  You can "undeclare" the
>  default namespace like so:
> 
>  <root xmlns="foo" >
>   <child xmlns="" />
>   </root>
> 
>  so why shouldn't you be able to undeclare other prefixes, e.g.
> 
>  <root xmlns:foo="bar" >
>    <child xmlns:foo="" />
>    </root>
> 
>  James Clark was the first to notice this, but that was after
>  namespaces had been out for a year.
> 
>  BTW, *nobody* thinks it's a good idea to allow a namespace name
>  to be an empty string - if the abovec were allowed, it would
>  strictly be in the interests of undeclaring prefixes; which
>  would break no existing namespace semantics.  Who knows,
>  it might even get done someday. -Tim

Wait-a-minute.

Why would you want to undeclare a namespace prefix???

In the case of

	<a:root xmlns:a="" /> 

we would have a qualified name "a:root", with a prefix of "a".

http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#ns-qualnames says:

"The Prefix provides the namespace prefix part of the qualified name, and
must be associated with a namespace URI reference in a namespace
declaration. [Definition:] The LocalPart provides the local part of the
qualified name. "

I don't see what this would be good for.

If you want to write an element which has no namespace and are unsure about
the context in which it appears, write

	<root xmlns="" /> 






-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> 
Thread:
Wayne Steele
Thomas B. Passin
Thomas B. Passin
Tim Bray
Julian Reschke
James Clark
Jason Diamond
Daniel Veillard
Jason Diamond

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved