ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> xml-dev
xml-dev
Re: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???
by Mike Champion other posts by this author
Mar 1 2002 5:06AM messages near this date
Re: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? | [xml-dev] how to write parallel programs
There's an intriguing post on the REST list from Jeff Bone on this 
issue:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rest-discuss/message/823

"In the process of buying into the OO religion, we failed to learn an 
important lesson: OO rarely works as a large-scale integration 
methodology. Generic interfaces and generic composition frameworks have 
always demonstrated better scalability, reusablility, simplicity, 
economics, etc. than OO. Cases in point: UNIX, Plan 9, the Web, Linda. 
Until we as an industry learn the lessons these examples pose, we're 
doomed to fail over and over again, developing technologies that cannot 
withstand the test of time and ubiquity: ONC and DCE RPC, CORBA, DCOM, 
etc."

I'm not sure exactly what "Generic interfaces and generic composition 
frameworks" refers to, but I'm thinking that this goes quite a bit 
beyond REST vs RPC and into some fairly profound issues of software 
architecture. Has the OO paradigm really hit the wall, at least as a 
meta-model for widely distributed applications?  If so, what's the 
alternative?  

I also note the convergence between Andy Gray announcing a new version 
of Ruple a few posts back, and Jeff Bone mentioning the Web and Linda as 
architectures that *do* scale.   Ruple is essentially a melding of the 
Web, Linda, and XML.... and as near as I can tell is consistent with 
REST principles, using essentially PUT, GET, and TAKE (=GET+DELETE) as 
its primitive operations.  Are we seeing the outlines of a new meta-
model for large scale software architecture that challenges a lot of the 
received wisdom of the OO paradigm? 

That is, perhaps "encapsulation" of data is not such a good thing after 
all ... or at least it's not scaling well to the Web. Perhaps it makes 
more sense to expose the data via generic operations rather than 
exchange objects that encapsulate data behind customized operations. I'm 
not sure, but things are getting interesting ....



-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> 
Thread:
Mike Champion
Thomas B. Passin
Leigh Dodds
Paul Prescod
Paul Prescod
Gavin Thomas Nicol
Mike Champion
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
Simon St.Laurent
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
Paul Prescod
Simon St.Laurent
Mark Baker
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
Simon St.Laurent
Paul Prescod
David LeBlanc
Andrzej Jan Taramina
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved