ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> xml-dev
xml-dev
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".
by Eric van der Vlist other posts by this author
Mar 5 2002 1:50PM messages near this date
Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X". | Re: [xml-dev] XML doesn't deserve its "X".
Klaus Backert wrote:

> >If you also mean the ability to include new information in an existing
> >vocabulary, I think that XML has failed so far
>  
>  Including new information into an existing vocabulary (= inserting character
>  data into an XML-document, which is built according to a problem-specific
>  language - do you mean this?) is part of my job (doing it by editor and by
>  own applications). No problems with this too. Could you specify how XML has
>  failed, please?

That's the easy part :=) (meaning no offense)

What's difficult is to extend it without having to predict what the 
needs will be (and where the document will have to be extended) and 
that's unfortunately the real challenge for real life open world 
applications.

<snippet-from-another-answer> 
Let's take a simple example... I have a text only element:

<ns1:foo> This is a simple example.</ns1:foo>

If I extend this example to include a semantic element to identify
"simple" as an adjective:

<ns1:foo> This is a <ns2:adj>simple</ns2:adj> example.</ns1:foo>

I am changing a text leaf node into a mixed content including 2 text
nodes separated by a child element and this will likely break 90+% of
the existing applications.

The situation is probably better if you want to add an element in an
elements only content model, but even in this case, if you take real
life applications, how many of them will you break? 30%, 50%, 75% ? Way
too many in any case!
</snippet-from-another-answer> 

Eric
-- 
See you in Seattle.
                                        http://knowledgetechnologies.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> 
Thread:
Eric van der Vlist
Francis Norton
Eric van der Vlist
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
Eric van der Vlist
Simon St.Laurent
Michael Fitzgerald
Mike Champion
Eric van der Vlist
Mike Champion
Leigh Dodds
Klaus Backert
Eric van der Vlist
Klaus Backert
Eric van der Vlist
Eric van der Vlist
Klaus Backert
Elliotte Rusty Harold
John Cowan
Elliotte Rusty Harold
Michael Fitzgerald
Eric van der Vlist
John Cowan
Simon St.Laurent

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved