Tim Bray wrote:

>  Interesting bet; I'll take it.  All we need is a document-embeddable,
>  idempotency-assumable form blessed officially and we're off to the
>  races.

I was assuming that we wouldn't have such a thing, but if we have and 
you win because it's solved the problem I'll probably be handing out 
cigars as well as booze!

>  I'm after the low-hanging fruit.  If the GET mapping turns
>  out to be popular, maybe somebody real smart will figure out a good
>  way to to encode your blocks in a URL. 

And I'll be laughing all the way to the wine shop :)

Francis.



-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>