ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> xml-dev
xml-dev
RE: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
by =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?= other posts by this author
Jun 7 2002 5:46PM messages near this date
Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? | [xml-dev] sharing dom on Virtual machines
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@[...].net] 
>  Sent: 07 June 2002 18:14
>  To: xml-dev@[...].org
>  Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
>  
>  
>  Bill de hÓra wrote:
>  > 
>  > 
>  >...
>  > 
>  > You've already moved outside of RDF. RDF doesn't have any 
>  notion of  
>  > hyperlinking.
>  
>  URIs embedded in XML making assertions about relationships is 
>  "hyperlinking."

URIs are a convenience for creating logical constants in RDF, not
for hyperlinking. Blanket assertions about XML hyperlinking doesn't
make it so in RDF. I note you quoted hyperlinking, a hyperlink here
implies representation retrieval.


>  > ... That some RDF constants might have a retrievable RDF 
>  schema at the 
>  > end of them is a happy coincidence (unless you're Patrick ;)
>  
>  How could that be true for "rdf:About"?

The fact that the URI may also be used retrieve information is a
neat trick, but it is a trick and it is not part of RDF. 

 
>  > The thing to do is keep the code that reasons about the 
>  graph separate 
>  > from the code that streams information into the graph.
>  
>  It doesn't matter how you segment it.

I think it does.


>  You haven't answered my question. Some piece of software 
>  stumbles upon "eg:Document". It doesn't know about 
>  eg:Document yet. It knows a bunch about eg:Work. eg:Document 
>  is a subclass of eg:Work, so everything it knows about 
>  eg:Work should apply to eg:Document. How does it discover the 
>  subclass relationship? I don't care how you segment it into 
>  rdf processor and application.

Noted. 

There's no facility in RDF to retrieve such information. Retrieval
is sensibly punted to something can do retrieval, hence I make the
distinction. I did answer your question, but perhaps I didn't make
myself clear. I'll try again: you do whatever you think makes sense
to get the information. That can be called a local convention or a
hack, but whatever you call it, it is beyond RDF's ambit to do so. 

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPQDxbOaWiFwg2CH4EQJo4QCaA+wdDBifsfnlYI7NlNbkd82obRsAoIL4
rRyTMm/2mad/hB8noagZ7a83
=qH8G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> 
Thread:
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
Thomas B. Passin
Paul Prescod
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
Paul Prescod
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=


Peter V. Mikhalenko

Ronald Bourret

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved