james anderson wrote:

>  We disagree.

Actually, I think we disagree only on the point of whether non-qualified
names in the absence of a default namespace are "in" a namespace. We
both agree that they can be treated as being in a null namespace, and
both theory and practice proceed nicely from that point.

We can now go back to arguing about DTD syntax :)

-- Ron

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>