ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> xml-dev
xml-dev
RE: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
by Dare Obasanjo other posts by this author
Aug 11 2002 2:51AM messages near this date
Re: [xml-dev] XLink olden days | [xml-dev] quarantining namespaces
All URIs are not equal. Equivalence between URLs depends on the URL's scheme. I'm not sure a
bout URNs. I believe namespaces in XML completely punts on it and says they have to match ch
aracter by character (or is that codepoint by codepoint?). 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@[...].com] 
	Sent: Sat 8/10/2002 7:23 PM 
	To: xml-dev@[...].org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: [xml-dev] Comparable considered necessary
	
	

	I've been thinking about the kind of processing I do with XML.
	
	Nearly all of it involves matching against patterns.  Some of it
	involves simple less-than/greater-than work with position.
	
	I think the largest concrete problem I have with URIs is their lack of a
	common mechanism for saying this equals that.  I can live without
	ordering for names, so that's not a big deal, but the lack of clarity on
	things like:
	
	HTTP://MONASTICXML.COM
	
	vs.
	
	http://monasticxml.com
	
	vs.
	
	http://monasticXML.com
	
	is pretty much killing, even without issues of relative and absolute,
	query strings, etc.  I don't see this getting better in the near future,
	as IRI issues and questions about escaping appear to be growing, not
	resolving.
	
	The lack of clarity - heck, the outright refusal to acknowledge the
	question - about how to get from an identifier to a resource or back
	again - is the nails in the coffin.
	
	It seems on the face of it to be a poor match for a system which depends
	at its foundations on identifying and recognizing labels. 
	
	Maybe it's time to ask if "SGML for the Web" is getting poisoned by some
	folks' notion of the Web, even while it succeeds regularly in expanding
	(often questionably) in expanding many people's concrete experience and
	understanding of the Web.
	
	--
	Simon St.Laurent
	Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
	Errors, errors, all fall down!
	http://simonstl.com
	
	-----------------------------------------------------------------
	The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
	initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 
	
	The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
	
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> 
	
	

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved