Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

>  Optional checks worry me. This just adds another point of confusion 
>  like the one in XML 1.0 with non-deterministic content models, where 
>  some parsers accept a document and some reject it. If the check is 
>  optional, it should further be guaranteed to be a non-fatal error, 
>  even when the check is made.

That is why we say that parsers which do normalization checking must report
to the application, and emphasize that lack of normalization is not a WF
error.

-- 
Only do what only you can do.           John Cowan <jcowan@[...].com> 
  --Edsger W. Dijkstra,                 http://www.reutershealth.com
    deceased 6 August 2002              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>