Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
by Robin Berjon other posts by this author
Nov 21 2002 10:46AM messages near this date
Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
|
Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Paul Prescod wrote:
> To me, there are more urgent areas of progress needed:
>
> * SVG implementations
> * XForms specs and finalization (yes, part of XHTML 2.0, but separable)
> * GUI widgets
>
> But perhaps XHTML can help with:
>
> * Richer metadata primitives (who created this page, with what tool, on
> what date, ...)
> * Richer linking primitives (next page, previous page, top page,
> printable version, owner-frame, ...)
All those exist, it's just that dated browsers like IE don't support them.
Mozilla, for instance, does.
You mention SVG and GUI widgets in almost the same breath. That's a place where
XHTML could help. By being integrated into a common profile with SVG, one would
gain a nice number of widgets that could be reimplemented in SVG but would be
much simpler with an XHTML renderer at hand, tables and lists being good candidates.
--
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@[...].fr>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
Thread:
Rick Jelliffe
Matt Gushee
Simon St.Laurent
Robin Berjon
Paul Prescod
Jelks Cabaniss
Paul Prescod
Simon St.Laurent
|