Daniel Veillard wrote:
>  On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 03:51:50AM -0700, MASSIMILIANO GRANDI wrote:
> >I would like to know what point XML Fragment Interchange W3C Candidate
> >Recommendation (issued on the 12th of February 2001) has got. 
>  
>    Nowhere. Lack of interest and absence of implementations, it just
>  stalled :-(

Was there complete lack of interest, or were there other serious issues? I've 
heard of renewed interest in XML Packaging from a number of places, and XML 
Fragments would be quite certainly useful for certain potential packaging 
requirements (eg streaming). I've also seen *very* strong interest in fragments 
from people looking into binary infosets.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@[...].fr> 
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>