Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm
l-dev] The subsetting has begun)
by Rich Salz other posts by this author
Feb 25 2003 4:35PM messages near this date
RE: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm
l-dev] The subsetting has begun)
|
[xml-dev] special characters
> o The Disconnect: Why should SOAP request a subset
> of the syntax if SOAP is described in terms of an infoset?
There are two parts to SOAP: how messages are transported between SOAP
nodes (the various transport bindings), and how you process the parsed
Infoset-based message abstraction once you've got it.
There is no disconnect: the only defined SOAP transport (XML over HTTP)
uses an XML subset.
Make sense?
/r$
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
Thread:
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Rich Salz
|
