James Clark wrote:
 >  As for why we didn't go further than this and support
>  non-whitespace separated lists, I think there was doubt as to whether 
>  this was pushing the envelope in the right direction.  Isn't it better 
>  to mark up complex structure explicitly with elements and attributes? 

A fair number of vocabularies created before XML Schema or RelaxNG have comma or 
semicolon separated lists. Another example could be the list of commands in SVG 
path data. But as tempting as it is to want to fix this with lists, I think that 
having a nice way of declaring compound types (à la Regular Fragmentation, but 
without changing the tree) would be the most general and elegant solution to this.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@[...].fr> 
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>