At 12:21 17/07/2003 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:

>    Well, that part of our infrastructure is an abomination IMHO.
> Sorry my code will fail on
>     file://c:/sgml/uriincl/uriIncl.xml
> because from the small semantic I can extract from RFC 2396, it's
> a file scheme with a c:/ authority, and to me C: is neither
> a server nor a registered component.

+1, even I could see that.
Is microsoft wrong!!!!



>    The only definition I found of the file scheme is RFC 1738
>      http://www.w3.org/Addressing/rfc1738.txt
> which obviously shows its age (and is obsoleted by 2396 except 2396
> does not define specific scheme). 1738 states

Perhaps TAG could take this one up... since the ietf appears
content to let it rot?

regards DaveP 



-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>