& XSLT At 7:58 AM -0400 10/16/02, Daniel Veillard wrote:

> done once at generation time. Apparently normalization checking is
> slightly lighter and as said that check is optional c.f. 2.13 wording.

Optional checks worry me. This just adds another point of confusion 
like the one in XML 1.0 with non-deterministic content models, where 
some parsers accept a document and some reject it. If the check is 
optional, it should further be guaranteed to be a non-fatal error, 
even when the check is made.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@[...].edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> 

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>