David Brownell <david-b@[...].net>  writes:

>  > Ken MacLeod <ken@[...].us> writes:
>  > 
>  > > The Perl SAX binding has used what I believe to be a very
>  > > powerful technique that I'd like to propose for SAX 2.0:
>  > > 
>  > >     Event handlers should be passed a DOM node instead of
>  > >     positional parameters.
>  
>  Seems to me that this is exactly what you'd get if you
>  listened for the right type of mutation events on the
>  root node of the DOM tree as it's being populated.
>  
>  No new API needed -- DOM L2 has such callbacks today.

That's a good point, is the SAX API needed if a similar API exists?
<me ducks="1"/> 

The biggest difference I think would be that SAX (generally) would use
"unattached" nodes in a push, start/end, mode.

  -- Ken

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************