Jonathan Borden wrote:

>  I have no problem with what the Infoset is trying to accomplish as a subset
>  of XML 1.0 + Names (just as I have no problem with what Common XML etc are
>  trying to accomplish), but this activity needs to come from a complete base
>  down to X,Y or Z subset each of which are useful.

"Needs to" = "must", and there is no "must" about it.  It "may" be done
that way, and it *has* been done that way.  I have no interest in recreating
the SGML Property Set, nor even an XML-specific ultra-low-level property set.
As I said, those who want the former know where to get it, and those
who want the latter now know where to get it too.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@[...].com> 
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)