RE: Why Are Schemas Hard? (WAS RE: "Uh, what do I need this for" (was
RE: XML.COM: How I Learne d t o Love daBomb))
by David E. Cleary other posts by this author
Aug 23 2001 1:18PM messages near this date
RE: Why Are Schemas Hard? (WAS RE: "Uh, what do I need this for" (was
RE: XML.COM: How I Learne d t o Love daBomb))
|
RE: Namespaces, W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX Filters forNames
paceProcessing)
> look at the thread about local elements. I have strong doubts
> about the fact
> that we'll see tools that fully supports the spec one day (most of current
> tools advertise a support of a "subset" of XSDL), the crucial
> question being
> : what will be the intersection of the supported XSDL subsets of all those
> tools ?
Microsoft and Tibco-Extensibility claim full support. Oracle was very close
last report I had at the beginning of the year, and Altova just has some
bugs to work through. The subset won't be due to tools, but due to how
people end up using it.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org> , an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
Thread:
Nicolas LEHUEN
David E. Cleary
|
