RE: [XML-SIG] PIRXX status
by Brian Quinlan other posts by this author
Aug 29 2001 9:08PM messages near this date
RE: [XML-SIG] PIRXX status
|
RE: [XML-SIG] PIRXX status
> >The problem is that we can only do these kinds of things (with any
> >degree of safety) if we merge the two extensions into one binary.
Is
> >that something that we should discuss?
>
> There are solutions that do NOT require such a merge, but a
> merge might be reasonable anyway. For now, I'll focus on
> getting the most important stuff in regarding Xerces only,
> and then worry about integration.
Doing the merge avoids the necessity of going through Python for each
node, which I'm sure will greatly hinder the performance.
Cheers,
Brian
_______________________________________________
XML-SIG maillist - XML-SIG@[...].org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/xml-sig
Thread:
Juergen Hermann
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
Brian Quinlan
Juergen Hermann
Brian Quinlan
Juergen Hermann
|