[xsl] Re: Re: What is the future of XSL-FO
by Celio Cidral Junior other posts by this author
Mar 1 2004 1:15PM messages near this date
[xsl] Re: What is the future of XSL-FO
|
Re: [xsl] Re: What is the future of XSL-FO
"G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@[...].com> escreveu na mensagem
news:5.2.0.9.0.20040227182721.01517148@[...]..
> Both RenderX and Antenna House .NET connections ... what is the barrier to
> commercial tools?
The cost.
> Can you consider only getting rid of commercial proprietary reporting
> tools? By using a commercial XSL-FO tool you have the protection of
> non-proprietary technology investment and flexibility to move your
> intellectual property to other implementations.
Good thoughts. I did not think about these other advantages.
> Note there is more than one open source XSL-FO tools: FOP and xmlroff are
> two that come to mind right away.
I have seen a bit about thesse tools, but they are not .NET libraries. There
is a port of FOP to J#; I ran some tests but it worked not; I'm still
sweating for make it work.
Cheers,
Celio Cidral Junior
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Thread:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9lio_Cidral_Junior?=
Celio Cidral Junior
Tokushige Kobayashi
Celio Cidral Junior
Celio Cidral Junior
Kurt Cagle
Kobayashi
Jirka Kosek
Tokushige Kobayashi
Michael Kay
|