Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question
by Nicolas Van Cleemput other posts by this author
Nov 7 2006 11:41PM messages near this date
Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question
|
Re: [xsl] i18n and l10n question
& XSLT Hi,
it works now. Or translations aren't really inline, but I couldn't use that
document-thing, because the translations were all in the document I was
transforming. I now use //factory, which is the root of our document and it
works fine.
The reason I'm using _ in stead of -, is because that is the way I get the
current locale from the Java application.
Nico
Quoting David Carlisle <davidc@[...].uk> :
>
> > therefore it is necessary that we follow l10n rules.
> yes but often the i18n lookup table with the
> language translations is separate from the actual document, which often
> makes it easier to add new translations.
>
> If your translations are "inline" then all you need to to is remove the
> <xsl:for-each select="//entry"> and </xsl:for-each> lines.
>
> Also I note that you are splitting the locale on _ rather than - . -
> would be more normal for language codes such as en-uk (ISO 639-1 or ISO
> 639-2).
>
> David
>
> --~------------------------------------------------------------------
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
> or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe@[...].com>
> --~--
>
>
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe@[...].com>
--~--
Thread:
Nicolas Van Cleemput
Nicolas Van Cleemput
Nicolas Van Cleemput
Nicolas Van Cleemput
Nicolas Van Cleemput
Nicolas Van Cleemput
Nicolas Van Cleemput
Nicolas Van Cleemput
|