>  A little strong, I think.  David already pointed out that the 1.1
>  draft is worded such that to emit a warning would in fact be a
>  non-conformance.

Although I do in fact agree with Daniel that having a widely distributed
processor that implements 1.1 rather than 1.0 by default is a real pain.

Given the choice, I'd rather have conformance to a rec and non
conformance to a withdrawn working draft than the other way round.

Having just spent a few hours trying to get a few thousand lines of
stylesheet (written by someone else) that was working on saxon to work
in MSXML by removing all the hidden 1.1 dependencies, I know how the
original poster feels.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list