RE: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 question
by Miloslav Nic other posts by this author
Dec 21 2001 11:01AM messages near this date
RE: [xsl] A paranoic XPath 2.0 question
|
[xsl] RE: XPath 2.0 (Backwards Compatibility)
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Michael Kay wrote:
Thanks for your explanations, I have spent last couple of hours browsing
the specs and I have found quite a few things to my liking (of course not
the breaking of XPath 1.0 compatibility)
Last few days I have had quite harsh headaches, which are
unfortunately not
alcohol related, and so I am quite prone to jump to paranoic explanations.
Fortunately, next two weeks I will have better things to do than read
specifications , but I am looking forward to January
when I will give it some grilling.
--
******************************************
<firstName> Miloslav </firstName>
<surname> Nic </surname>
<mail> nicmila@[...].com </mail>
<support> http://www.zvon.org </support>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Thread:
Miloslav Nic
David Carlisle
Michael Kay
Miloslav Nic
|