On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:50:37AM +1000, John Barratt wrote:
>  Shane Hathaway wrote:
>  >In reality, I think there's little reason why ZEO over a local 
>  >connection should be noticeably slower than using FileStorage directly. 
>  > Network communication time should be dwarfed by hard drive seek time.
>  
>  Do you mean that ZEO as it is shouldn't be this slow when loading into 
>  the client cache, or just that it should be able to be coded to be 
>  almost as fast as FileStorage (eg. using non async code as discussed) 
>  and it is hence a known issue?

Our DB fits into the OS page cache.  I don't think IO is a bottleneck.
OProfile results seem to support that theory.

  Neil

_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@[...].org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev