What kind of practical sense does it make to batch 400k objects? I can no
imagine single usecase where one
would be interested in walking through such an amount of objects manually.
Better organize your data in a more
handy way or implement some search logic for bringing the batch size to a
number of relevant object.s

-aj

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 00:04, Ken Ara <feedreader@[...].com>  wrote:

> 
> 
>  Under our setup, beyond 300-400,000 contained objects, the batching
>  provided by getBatchObjectListing becomes unusable. I've seen this problem
>  mentioned somewhere but never any hint of a solution.
> 
> 
>