ASPN ActiveState Programmer Network
ActiveState
/ Home / Perl / PHP / Python / Tcl / XSLT /
/ Safari / My ASPN /
Cookbooks | Documentation | Mailing Lists | Modules | News Feeds | Products | User Groups


Recent Messages
List Archives
About the List
List Leaders
Subscription Options

View Subscriptions
Help

View by Topic
ActiveState
.NET Framework
Open Source
Perl
PHP
Python
Tcl
Web Services
XML & XSLT

View by Category
Database
General
SOAP
System Administration
Tools
User Interfaces
Web Programming
XML Programming


MyASPN >> Mail Archive >> zope-cmf
zope-cmf
[Zope-PTK] Re: [ZDP] Zope Documentation Portal Community Policy
by Tom Deprez other posts by this author
Apr 29 2000 1:28AM messages near this date
[Zope-PTK] Zope Documentation Portal Community Policy | [Zope-PTK] standard_html_header
> > However, taking into account the discussions about the Portal Toolkit
> > and documentation of the last few days, I have another proposal. Let's
> > make it an official Zope Community Policy (TM) to make all documentation
> > primarily available through the new Documentation Portal. 
> 
> I think we should steer in this direction, but the first rule is Linus's
motto
> of "Show me the code", and then we can talk about moving the whole process of
> Documentation to ZDP if all parties agree an this.
> 
> I would like to develop this system like a prototype at first, and if it
> works, we can approach the Zope community and Digital Creations to ask them
> to make the documentation available via ZDP only.

Correct!

> >How do we know what documentation applies to what Zope version?
> 
> We have been talking about this, but we have not yet come to a solution.
> I don't think it would be great to add a version property to all
> documents. Instead, I would like to store the creation date explicitely
> and infer the Zope version from it.
> 
> >What's the difference between the above and documentation that has been
> >corrected/abandoned because it was simply wrong/out of date and not just
wrong
> >for a version of Zope? 
> 
> Wrong documentation can appear in the best content management system. As
> long as peer review does not take place bad documentation remains bad.
> We are planning a system where a Reviewer can select outdated stuff which
> will stay there for a while and be removed by an Approver perhaps after
> checking back with the Maintainer.

Another problem is that some things go along over several versions and
others not...

> [Tom:]
> > Nice idea, it looks something to the small knowledge base I've made.
> 
> If I understand you right, the following ZClasses are
> the same in your KB and in the ZD Portal:
> 
> TopicFolder = TKBCategory
> Topic       = TKBItem
> 
> TKBCategory objects contain a string of the categories in which they exists
> TKBCategory objects contain TKBItem objects. The KBItems contain nothing.
> A ZCatalog searches for the TKBCategory objects 'category' property.
> A search for the category leads to the TKBItems by going to the TKBCategory
> Folders and listing all it's items ?

yup, but of course the items contains a property which holds the problem
and the items contain the solutions (a solution class) to this problem.

> > Generally I think it is a good idea to create the ZDPortal. However, I hope
> > the way to generate the hierarchy wouldn't be too difficult or to
> > slumbercome.
> 
> The hierarchy is created on the fly while adding documents. The subject of
> every object is always the topic of the parent. Therefore you only have
> to specify a Topic. There are as many Topics to choose from as there are 
> Topics in the Subject it is created under. If the Subject or Topic does not
> yet exist, it can be created dynamically, successively building up a
hierarchy.
> This process can be moderated.

OK
> 
Thread:
Maik =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6der?=
Tom Deprez

Privacy Policy | Email Opt-out | Feedback | Syndication
© ActiveState Software Inc. All rights reserved