When I was subscribed to the ACSpg mailing list a couple of months ago
when they started, they started out on SourceForge. After a brief time
they decided they could do a better job themselves with cvs and their
own tools.

I think Zope can do (does) better also.

As you we already have mailing lists, cvs and the tracker. Were good to
roll.

Jimmie Houchin


Chris Withers wrote:
>  
>  > Let's not get too wrapped up with the _implementation_ of how to
>  > collaborate.  If people are genuinely interested in working together,
>  > we'll find a way to do it.
>  
>  I'll go with this. The main reason I suggested SourceForge is 'cos of
>  the environment it provides, but DC and the Zope community already has
>  all this and better:
>  
>  - We have three very active mailing lists
>  - We have the Tracker, which beats Sourceforge by a LONG way ;-)
>  - DC already has a good, solid CVS architecture
>  
>  > Still, we have to get to the point where there are people besides
>  > Digital Creations making checkins.  This should happen for Zope itself,
>  > and I view PTK as a good starting point to get our feet wet.
>  
>  This I have to make the point of totally agreeing with ;-)
>  
>  The PTK could prove very useful in terms of exploring the issues of:
>  - non-DC CSV checkins
>  - non-DC people as supporters/etc in the Tracker(s)
>  
>  This could then, very importantly, be applied to Zope, ZEO, Tracker, etc
>  as well...
>  
>  cheers,
>  
>  Chris
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Zope-PTK maillist  -  Zope-PTK@[...].org
>  http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-ptk
>  
>  See http://www.zope.org/Products/PTK/Tracker for bug reports and feature requests